Where is dist.sonarsource.com content?

[agabrys (Adam Gabryś)]

Hello,
At the beginning I apologize for the chosen category, but I couldn’t choose Get help without any product.

I see that dist.sonarsource.com redirects all requests to www.sonarsource.com. This server stored 3rd-party tools rules coverage. Where I can find this data?

I found 5 topics with dead links. I think there are a lot of them in the Internet (StackOverflow etc.) too.

Convert CheckStyles, FindBugs, PMD rules to Sonar Way

Those plugins are incompatible, but will be fixed soon: Sonar-FindBugs 3.9.0 is incompatible with SonarQube 7.4 Checkstyle Plugin doesn’t work with SonarQube 7.3 List of available replacements were here: Code Quality and Code Security | Developers First | SonarSource Code Quality and Code Security | Developers First | SonarSource but the web page does not more exist

FindBugs/Checkstyle rules removal roadmap?

We are using SonarQube 6.7.4. We use some findbugs rules and some checkstyle rules and I’m aware that these are being integrated into squid rules. I have some questions about that: The findbugs list that I’m following is on http://dist.sonarsource.com/reports/coverage/findbugs.html . The checkstyle rules list that I’m following is on http://dist.sonarsource.com/reports/coverage/checkstyle.html . In both lists, some rules were rejected and will not be integrated into squid. If we currently rel…

Integrate with FindSecBugs

Cmm, As an addendum to Clint’s answer, you might be interested in this report that shows how FindSecBugs rules map to rules native to the SonarQube Java Analyzer (and as such are available in SonarLint). Colin

SonarJava Rules vs SpotBugs/Checkstyle Rules

Jean and Adam, A similar list exists for checkstyle. http://dist.sonarsource.com/reports/coverage/checkstyle.html Colin

Need help with focused Sonar / Findbugs Analysis

Florent, This report might shed some light on findbugs/sonarjava parity. http://dist.sonarsource.com/reports/coverage/findbugs.html Colin

Cheers

[ganncamp (G Ann Campbell)]

Hi Adam,

We had stopped re-generating those reports a while ago and the dist move killed the zombies.

 
Sorry,
Ann

[jperez007 (Juan P)]

Hello, ok…but where can I find equivalent information?

You are pushing for adoption of SonarJava vs FindBugs, yet you don’t provide a clear road map for migration. I have 207 FindBugs rules that I wanted to move to SonarJava, but it seems that the only solution proposed is to go one by one doing a manual search in the available sonar rules. If at least I could have an equivalency table, that would help; but doing this by guessing is just too much. If this is the path, it’d be easier to just install the FindBugs plug-in and ignore SonarJava altogether. Is this the path that you want people to follow? Please help!