Hi @Tiago_Ferreira and @Simone_Alessandrelli, a warm welcome to the SonarSource community!
We are actually looking closer into adding SonarLint support for Rider!
May I ask to Rider developers here to share a little more about your context, and specifically:
which language do you use Rider for (C# / VB.NET / ASP.NET, …) and which kind of applications you develop with Rider?
do you use Rider on your own initiative or is part of a company setup?
do you use SonarQube or SonarCloud in your development pipeline?
what are the top expectations you have from SonarLint (e.g. better code inspections w.r.t. the IDE ones, quality profile synchronization with SonarQube, anything else?)
Thanks @Marco_Comi,
we use Rider in our company to create cloud applications with dot net core on AWS, or for standard AspNetCore applications.
We’re using SonarQube in our dev pipeline and it could be really useful to have an IDE linter that uses the same rules defined in our pipeline.
Hi @Marco_Comi
we as a company use SonarCloud, which gives great insights into our C# code and prevents issues entering the main branches through our build pipelines. However it would be great if SonarCloud type analysis could be seen in the IDE, such as code smells. If it obeyed all the same rules as the SonarCloud configuration then that would be amazing but secondary to having any analysis.
Hello @SimonLegg and welcome to the SonarSource community!
Thanks for sharing your expectations for SonarLint in Rider, it is indeed great to see that you (along with many other users as you see in this thread) are interested to analyze your code with SonarLint in Rider; and great to see the many already use SonarCloud or SonarQube, and would like to have the same rules applied in the IDE, that makes a lot of sense to us.
We will keep you posted here when we have some updates on the topic.
We are starting an early adopter phase for SonarLint for Rider. To not pollute this thread, I have started a new one where I will post updates, and early adopters can provide feedback.