While I understand that ignoring overall coverage changes for small changes in a project is helpful to deal with rounding errors and the like, I don’t see how this can apply to diff coverage.
Would it be an idea to stop ignoring diff coverage requirements for small changes? Sometimes changing one line of code can break a lot of things in our software.
To be clear, you’re asking for a way to turn off what I call the “fudge factor” - the fact that the Quality Gate ignores conditions on Coverage and Duplicatios on New Code if there are fewer than 20 lines changed?