A new analysis will need to be run for the information to update. Such a ticket exists for SonarQube (SONAR-8502) to remove the disparity. But not necessarily in the direction you’re thinking.
We think it makes sense for the Quality Gates / Profiles actually used during analysis to display – not what we be used on the next analysis (because it doesn’t actually tie to the results you see in the dashboard). What do you think?
What seems most important to me is that it’s obvious what is being displayed. I don’t know much about UX, but I do like Steve Krug’s principle: “Don’t make me think.”
In this case, I see quality gate and quality profiles not being handled the same, and then I think there’s a bug there.
But thanks for confirming it’s actually not a bug – then this ticket seems Resolved to me…