We are finding that there are discrepancies between different levels of pages in the SonarCloud report and also between number of items reported and the grades awarded (which don’t seem to match the SonarCloud metrics page). Before the recent UI change we hadn’t seen any discrepencies here - both pages had shown the same stats.
A couple of examples:
One project where we are seeing 91 reliability bugs on the overview of projects page, then when you drill into that project and choose overall code we see 691 bugs. The same project shows 0 security issues at the top level and 15 in the same category when you drill in and choose overall code.
A different project where we are seeing 0 bugs/reliability issues at the top level and 16 reliability issues when we drill in. Both places also show an A grade, whereas according to SonarCloud metrics the presence of any issues should result in a lower grade.
Thanks for the screenshots; they’re helpful in understanding what you’re experiencing.
This is a bit of a switching-horses-midstream situation. On the list of projects, you’re seeing the old categorizations: Bugs, Vulnerabilities, Code Smells. On the project homepage you’re seeing the new categorization. The thing is, that not everything that was considered a Bug in the old system translates to a Reliability issue in the new one. And vice versa.
Note that you’ve got 2.9k Code Smells and only 2.3k Maintainability issues. Some migrated in the recategorization, and that’s also what you’re seeing with Bugs/Reliability.
I know this is confusing. All I can say is that eventually it will get better. (I hope!)
Thanks for taking a look. Do you know if there is a timescale for the two views matching again and is this something all users are experiencing?
Is the project homepage (rather than the projects list) the best source of truth for our reporting purposes internally? i.e. ultimately will all stats match this eventually (hopefully)?
