java:S1105 false positives

[grimsa (Gediminas Rimša)]

S1105 seems to produce false positives for Java records in the following layout:

    private record MyRecord(
            UUID id,
            String title,
    ) {        // Issue reported here
    }

For methods equivalent layout raises no issue:

        private Object options(
                Object arg1,
                Object arg2
        ) {

Found a similar thread: FP S1105 for java 16+ and records - #3 by Quentin - possibly SONARJAVA-4094 was not implemented fully?

While reviewing violations I noticed another false positive:

Not sure what is specific about this place though, as we have hundreds of similar methods, and the violation is reported just for this one.

[Leonardo_Pilastri]

Hi Gediminas, sorry about the late response.
I had a look at the issue and to me it is indeed a FP, I still have to verify what was the implementation for the previous ticket you mentioned, but one thing that I found out is that we’re missing the ( and ) parenthesis when parsing record declarations. This leads to rule S1105 not being able to recognize that there is a token before the { in examples like the one you posted here.
I created this ticket that should fix this and more issues related to record classes.
Thank you for the feedback, this will surely improve the analyzer!