TL;DR: Starting with 8.1.x the Format of the Filename changed. I would like to suggest a symlink that is “simple-versioned” for every download that points to the real (more complicated) file URL. For this example i would like to be able to download the (on the Website advertised as) 8.2 Version of sonarqube via the URL https://binaries.sonarsource.com/Distribution/sonarqube/sonarqube-8.2.zip
To go into more details i want to tell you about the way i fell into the trap of trying to download the binary for sonarqube-18.104.22.168929
Then i accessed the download page mentioned at the bottom of Anns Announcement Post and inspected the download URL for the 8.2 community edition.
The Link i found there pointed not to sonarqube-8.2.zip but to sonarqube-22.214.171.124929.zip.
In the future I would like to download the next Sonarqube without browsing any webpage just by changing a variable in my script and therefore suggest the abovementioned solution (simple URL that points to the more complicated one)
Any particular reason Why? other than that you were used to the old format of URL? It seems a pretty rare occasion that somebody tries to download a new version of SonarQube without going to https://www.sonarqube.org/downloads/ (or at least, I’d like to think that’s the entrypoint for most people downloading SonarQube)
i guess its just that now i have extra steps to get to the same result as before. Before that it was enough to see the new version advertised as e.g “8.3 out now!” … then i changed the variable to that and went to work.
Now i have to find out exactly how it is named. It is not a big hastle, just a minor change i have to comply to.
yes, i understand the point of view why you’d like to think that for most ppl … and you probably are right as always it is a trade off where you made a decision. I assume i am not the only one that fell into that trap. Do you monitor 404s? You could watch for simple-version-404s and find out how ppl consume your product. Just brainstorming, pls unread the last sentences.
If i may ask … what are the reasons/benefits that make it interesting for me to know the less-than-minor-versions?
Being totally transparent: this change was mainly made to make SonarQube easier to release from a technical POV, (something that I understand was becoming… a bit of a struggle). You can read more about it at SONAR-12665.
Otherwise stated – the change wasn’t made to benefit end-users directly, although it now takes the team less time to release and the release is less risky so… a benefit in a roundabout way
thank you for linking the jira issue! being able to comprehend the reasoning (and seeing the thought process behind that) helps a lot
after thinking more intensely about the ways this “impacts” myself (minor impacts, therefore the “”) i think the general outcome outweighs my process change.
interesting read, by the way! Thank you for taking the time getting this information through.