Can not execute Checkstyle from sonar

Get help SonarQube
#1

The sonar-checkstyle plugin was installed into my SonarQube instance and I used the set of rules defined in this plugin for my project.
However, when scanning project from sonar maven, it can’t execute.

Failed to execute goal org.sonarsource.scanner.maven:sonar-maven-plugin:3.7.0.1746:sonar (default-cli) on project xxx: Can not execute Checkstyle: cannot initialize module TreeWalker - cannot initialize module JavadocMethod - Property ‘allowMissingJavadoc’ does not exist, please check the documentation -> [Help 1]

Please help me know what is wrong of this.

Thank you so much.

Without using rules into Checkstyle plugin, the flow is executed in normal.

#2

Hi,

Please report this as an issue on the Checkstyle project. I don’t think the Checkstyle maintainers are monitoring this community.

 
Ann

#3

Hi Nghia
Did you find a solution to this problem?
I did run into the exact same problem and couldn’t find any solution.
Thanks
Patrick

#4

Is there any solution for this issue, I met it also.
Thanks.

#5

I have the same problem, someone found a solution? I have another sonar with enterprise license and it doesn’t have the problem, but i need to return to the community edition and that have this error. The two sonar have the same plugins and rules.

#6

Hi there,

i hope my boldness in ninja-commenting will not be noted as too pompous, but i today found this thread because i, too, have had some trouble with a checkstyle-error.

I am using SQ CE 8.6 and just recently added the checkstyle-plugin but never activated any rules from the checkstlye-rules-repository in the quality-profile used!

Nevertheless the scanner failed because some checkstyle-exception. The only way for me to quickly solve this, was to un-install the checkstyle plugin in SQ Server. After that no Checkstyle-Exception happened anymore (kinda obvious, iknow)

So for me the takeaway was “even though i have no checkstyle-rule activated in my used qualityprofile, it nevertheless failed the scanner-analysis-process on the clientside” … i’d agree if someone (looking at you ann :nerd_face:) would suggest that this should probably be handled by the checkstyle-devs :+1:

#7

Yes, I agree that this should be handled by the Checkstyle devs. Looking at you Daniel to raise an issue there (as I advised in August…). :wink:

It’s worth noting that we don’t police how plugins run. As I understand it, they register themselves to be invoked at a certain phase of analysis(?) and we invoke them. It’s up to them to say “oh, I don’t need to run”… or not. A long-standing example of this is the FindBugs plugin, which will run every rule it’s got - whether or not you have any FB rules enabled - and then filter what gets loaded into SonarQube based on your profile.

 
Ann