UCFGs is taking too long to respond

SonarQube Server / Community Build
, ,
1

we are using net4.6 msbuild and our sonar scan end is taking 15 minutes to complete. I turned on the verbose mode and found that Reading from UCFGs takes too long (~8 minutes). Can you please help us in this? I will be able to share whole dump privately if you need.

[17:58:18] : [Step 13/13] 17:58:18.157 INFO: Sensor JavaSecuritySensor [security]
[17:58:18] : [Step 13/13] 17:58:18.158 INFO: Reading type hierarchy from: D:\SourceControl\SaturnPR\APP33_BUILD_01.sonarqube\out.sonar\ucfg2\java
[17:58:18] : [Step 13/13] 17:58:18.158 INFO: Read 0 type definitions
[17:58:18] : [Step 13/13] 17:58:18.161 INFO: No UCFGs have been included for analysis.
[17:58:18] : [Step 13/13] 17:58:18.161 INFO: Sensor JavaSecuritySensor [security] (done)
[17:58:18] : [Step 13/13] 17:58:18.161 INFO: Sensor CSharpSecuritySensor [security]
[17:58:18] : [Step 13/13] 17:58:18.161 INFO: Reading type hierarchy from: D:\SourceControl\SaturnPR\APP33_BUILD_01.sonarqube\out\ucfg_cs2
[17:59:03] : [Step 13/13] 17:59:03.479 INFO: Read 5394 type definitions
[17:59:03] : [Step 13/13] 17:59:03.554 INFO: Reading UCFGs from: D:\SourceControl\SaturnPR\APP33_BUILD_01.sonarqube\out\ucfg_cs2
[18:07:35] : [Step 13/13] 18:07:35.527 DEBUG: Excluding 6 UCFGs as they are using the same method Ids.
[18:07:35] : [Step 13/13] 18:07:35.533 INFO: 18:07:35.5323132 Building Runtime Type propagation graph
2

Hey there.

What version of SonarQube are you using? The information should be in the footer of your instance.

3

Hi, my projects have the same problem. Sometimes Reading from UCFGs takes long time (~17 minutes) but sometimes takes a bit short, around 5min. I am using * Enterprise Edition* Version 9.9. Is there anything I can do to reduce the time?

4

Same issue here, do someone have solution?

6

Facing same issue, Anyone got the solution?

7

To anybody who comes across this thread, I suggest you create a new thread and share very specific information:

  • What version of SonarQube are you using?
  • What language(s) are you analyzing?
  • The logs from your specific analysis
8

A post was split to a new topic: Analyzing UCFGs takes too long