Two false negative about the rule RSPEC-2252

Rules and Languages Report False-positive / False-negative...
1

Hi, I found two false negatives about the rule RSPEC-2252. Please read the following code example:

Case 1

static final int a = 0;
public void foo() {
  for(int i = 0; i < a; i++) {}  // should report a warning here
}

Case 2

public void foo() {
    for(int i = 0; i < 0 + 1 - 1; i++) {}  // should report a warning here
}

I think these two cases are hardcoded and literally equivalent with for(int i = 0; i < 0; i++). Hence, they are false negatives. Thanks for your consideration.

Version: Latest

4

Hi Belle,

I created SONARJAVA-4251 to improve the rule S2252.
Thanks for your feedback,
Alban