Must-share information (formatted with Markdown ): which versions are you using (SonarQube, Scanner, Plugin, and any relevant extension) Sonarqube 7.4, Sonarqube scanner 3.4 what are you trying to achieve Analyze the code for sonar issues. Jococo Test reports are excluded what have you tried so f…

Hi Adam, There are no plugins added to these servers and they are out of box

Hi, You mentioned that you’re using a custom profile. What happens if you use the Sonar way profile? And just to verify, you don’t have the FindBugs plugin loaded, do you? Ann

Hi Ann, There is no FindBugs plugin loaded to sonarqube server. Thanks Harshal

HI Harshal, Thanks for the verification. I notice this in your initial post: sonar.sources=project/source, project/source Why do you have the same thing listed twice? It may also help to add a duplications exclusion (project Administration > General Settings > Analysis Scope). Also, it would …

Hi Ann, Thanks for quick response! Due to confidentiality I named it like this. There are two different code sources. In dubug logs its not clear which step is taking time. All I am interested is only Java file scanning and exclude other files which I did through sonar properties using exclusion B…

Hi Harshal, It’s not quite clear to me whether you’ve worked through this or still have questions, so to be on the safe side… Yes, setting your duplication exclusion to **/*.java should exclude those files from duplication detection. Given your other exclusions, Java files should be the only ones …

Hi Ann, Thanks for quick response :slight_smile: Appreciate your continuous help. Unfortunately issue still stands unresolved :frowning: even if I add duplication exclusion **/*.java. It still takes same time. I may try **/*.* also but as source points to only java files it wont make a difference …

Hi Harshal, This isn’t the full debug log. Did the log roll, by chance? Are there additional files numbered 2, 3, …? Also, what’s your version of SonarJava (found in Administration > Marketplace)? And if it’s not 5.10.1, could you upgrade and provide fresh logs? I know this is a commitment on your…

Hi Ann, Entire log file is too huge to upload hence I uploaded only one part of it. Let me know if you need entire log file. Also I have been testing it with multiple sonarqube versions like 5.6.1, 5.6.7, 6.6.7, 7.5 etc I found 5.6.1 a bit quicker in analysis About sonarJava I dont find marketpla…

Hi, I’m going to set this aside until we have the results of your new analysis. Ann

SonarQube 6.7.x is taking 31 hrs to scan 658k lines of code using sonar scanner 3.4. However with sonar qube 5.6.x it use to take only 30 mins

SonarQube Server / Community Build

Topic		Replies	Views
SonarQube Java scanner slow on 675k loc SonarQube Server / Community Build java , azuredevops-server	6	2015	July 27, 2020
Sonar Scanner taking too long for analyzing SonarQube Server / Community Build java , sonarqube , scanner	7	5147	March 19, 2024
My project scanning time got increased suddenly with huge time difference SonarQube Server / Community Build	30	4183	June 28, 2021
Sonar-scanner takes 10 times as long for analyzing SonarQube Server / Community Build java , scanner	1	544	March 6, 2023
Sonar Scanner - Slow scan of java project SonarQube Server / Community Build java , scanner , coverage	5	1665	January 30, 2023

SonarQube 6.7.x is taking 31 hrs to scan 658k lines of code using sonar scanner 3.4. However with sonar qube 5.6.x it use to take only 30 mins

Related topics