Hi everyone. 
How is this rating possible:
We have 12 issues (medium impact). A rating requires 0 issues.
What we have realized is that 12 rules are linked with mantainability and realiability qualities (both)…
We understand that it is a malfunction of SonarQube.
Thanks in advance.
QA Team.
Hey there.
Let’s start with the basics requested in the template post. What version of SonarQube are you using?
Sorry… 
Our current Version: 10.4.1.88267
Thanks in advance.
Hi @Raul_QA ,
Thank you for raising this. It is confusing behaviour and something that we will be addressing shortly.
Until we ship 10.8, the ratings are still based upon the type of the issue (vulnerability, bug, code smell). Reliability, for instance, is calculated based on the count of ‘bugs’ you have. This can mean you get a situation like the one you are seeing. You can have issues that are ‘code smells’ and so aren’t counted in the reliability rating, but have a reliability quality associated with them and so appear in the count of reliability issues. This is confusing and we will be addressing this in the upcoming 10.8 release which is targeted for December.
If you list the 12 open issues and they are listed as ‘bugs’ and not ‘code smells’ then there is something else going on. Please let us know if that is the case.
John
hello we understand. The rating is based on bugs, not really on issues related to the quality of the software that will arrive in the next version.
Thank you very much for the answer.
Hi @Raul_QA ,
Version 10.8 is out now and hopefully fixes what you were seeing.
Please let us know if it doesn’t.
John
Hi,
Thanks for your help, we will plan the update, and let’s see.
Raúl.
