Ratcheting Quality Gate conditions: Fail Quality Gate if coverage decreases from last analysis

SonarQube Product Manager for a Day
, ,
31

Hi @vicsonvictor,

Thanks for your interest. We’ve created a portal card where the other users who share similar concerns can tell more about their needs. You can find it here.
The topic is a candidate for the roadmap. If we move forward with this, we will update the card. And if you left your email, you will receive a notification.

Chris

33

Has there been any progress or update since then? How can we help to speed up the process? I saw that a card was made on another site, but I haven’t seen any other progress, so I’m interested.

1 Like
34

Is there any update on this?

35

Hi @sarkiroka & @Gyorgy_VARGA,

Please be sure to vote on the portal card Chris linked above. That’s where Product Managers are tracking “traction”. It’s votes there that will (maybe, hopefully, eventually) get the feature implemented.

 
Ann

36

Thanks, but we already voted there. :slight_smile:

1 Like
37

Tell your friends? :sweat_smile:

1 Like
38

Adding my agreement too that we need this way of failing quality gate if coverage decreases that existing.

Atleast showing that information on the PR decoration would be so useful even if you do not have a quality gate on it.

Maybe implementing this messaging on PR decoration would be useful as an iteration from your side??

Please please add this capability!! Just show us the message on PR decoration. That’s all.

1 Like