Hi Jos,
Sorry for the late reply.
You’re right, that’s a false positive that we should fix.
I guess you mean 66, 77, 78 and 88.
Out of those 4:
- We don’t raise issues with levels 66 and 77.
- I believe that it makes sense for the rule to raise an issue when several 88-level condition names are associated with the same variable and are not aligned.
In the end, I think that we have to change the behavior only for level 78.
Please tell me if I missed something.
I created SONARCOBOL-1675 to track this problem.
Thanks a lot for your feedback!
Pierre-Yves