Confusing 'noncompliant' comments in compliant solution of S5810

@Alexandre_Gigleux Looks like there’s an issue with the description of the new rule S5810. The compliant solution block provides examples with “// noncompliant” comments. It’s very confusing which of the two blocks is the correct one.

Hello Stefanos Kalantzis,

You are right, I updated the description accordingly, thanks for the feedback.

Also, note that this is an announcement thread, to not get unnoticed, please create a dedicated one next time.


This topic was automatically closed 7 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.