581 How can we adjust or make these analyses and reports from sonarcloud.io more flexible?

We have an Enterprise subscription to SonarCloud.io.

And we’ve encountered several questions about how SonarCloud Enterprise considers errors or improvements in COBOL code, and in general with the languages ​​we use.

For example, several COBOL programmers are telling us that, for instance, SONAR suggests splitting blocks of code from 100-line fragments of a function into 5 fragments of 20 lines each, even when it doesn’t impact performance or security. How can we make these reports more flexible?

Hi,

Welcome to the community!

It sounds like you need to customize your Quality Profile. If your developers don’t agree with that rule, you should create a new profile and then remove that rule from it if you started from a copy of another profile, or just not add it.

 
HTH,
Ann