We have an Enterprise subscription to SonarCloud.io.
And we’ve encountered several questions about how SonarCloud Enterprise considers errors or improvements in COBOL code, and in general with the languages we use.
For example, several COBOL programmers are telling us that, for instance, SONAR suggests splitting blocks of code from 100-line fragments of a function into 5 fragments of 20 lines each, even when it doesn’t impact performance or security. How can we make these reports more flexible?