our builds have started taking 3x more time… With the rules we had in place, it used to take 10mins for the analysis and now its taking ~30mins… This is really unacceptable for our PR workflow… Wondering what can we do here? Is there a timeline to look at the performance issues?

Hello everyone, thanks for your inputs. The issue you are talking about is related to MMF-1870 . We are fully aware of it and we are considering solutions to tackle it. I added this post to the ticket to keep track of it, you will be able to follow the evolution there. In the meantime, it would be…

SonarJava 6.0.1 is slower than 5.14 and this impacts our PR analysis time

SonarQube Server / Community Build

anon67236913 (anon67236913) January 28, 2020, 10:20am 9

Hi,

there’s already an exisiting support ticket, see

The test uses the latest SonarScanner for Ant, as our legacy projects still use Ant as buildtool.

with SonarJava 5.14
[sonar:sonar] Sensor JavaSquidSensor [java] (done) | time=412283ms

with SonarJava 6.01
[sonar:sonar] Sensor JavaSquidSensor [java] (done) | time=11706070ms

Gilbert

Topic		Replies	Views
SonarJava 6.0.1 3 times slower than 5.14 SonarQube Server / Community Build java , performance	7	1808	February 13, 2020
SonarJava 6.15.1 4 times slower than 5.10.1 SonarQube Server / Community Build java , performance	3	1070	November 18, 2021
Analysis times almost doubled SonarQube Server / Community Build database	7	1433	August 3, 2020
SonarQube 8.1 Java Plugin 6.0.2 very slow SonarQube Server / Community Build java , performance	2	1493	February 20, 2020
Upgrading Java analyzer from v5.14 to v6.3.2 with Sonarqube 7.9 LTS will increase 2x the analysis time SonarQube Server / Community Build java , sonarqube , gradle , scanner , performance	3	1237	March 2, 2021

SonarJava 6.0.1 is slower than 5.14 and this impacts our PR analysis time

Related topics