Ignore missing generic font family (S4649) for icon fonts

Rules and Languages Report False-positive / False-negative...
,
3

Hello,

Just to be clear, what you are saying is that the following issue is a false-positive. Is that correct?

image
image1022×145 17 KB

Personally, instead of supporting a custom field that will not often customized, I would prefer that out of the box S4649 ignores font-family when it’s used in the context of icon fonts.

Today, I see two options:

  • hard code a list of well known Icon Fonts (“Font Awesome*”, …) but that would be complex to keep it up to date
  • find a way to determine that no issue should be raised if this or that other field is there. For example, if font-family is defined without any generic font family but with a content field, then nothing should be raised.

Do you see a better way to determine that a CSS block is related to an Icon Font?

Alex