# SonarLint and SonarQube LTS - rules aren't in sync **URL:** \ **Category:** IntelliJ Platform\ **Tags:** intellij, sonarqube-ide\ **Created:** [November 13, 2018, 1:27pm UTC](https://community.sonarsource.com/t/sonarlint-and-sonarqube-lts-rules-arent-in-sync/4213 "2018-11-13T13:27:45Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 8\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![svf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/bbce88/32.png) [@svf](https://community.sonarsource.com/u/svf)\ **Post date:** [November 13, 2018, 1:27pm UTC](https://community.sonarsource.com/t/sonarlint-and-sonarqube-lts-rules-arent-in-sync/4213/1 "2018-11-13T13:27:45Z")
Hi, Rules aren’t in sync between SonalLint and SonarQube LTS. - versions used SonarLint 4.0 under IntellijIDEA 2018.2.5 SonarQube 6.7.1 LTS - error observed Configuration: Non-default quality profile with activated rule squid:S00116 (Field names should comply with a naming convention). The rule activated with Major severity and customized pattern. That is, default values for the rule are set to “Minor” and “\[1\][a-zA-Z0-9]_$", but for this profile they were changed to “Major” and "\[2\][A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]_$” after activation. The binding was updated after that change. Error: ```auto public class A { private String member; } ``` Expected result: SonarLlink issue generated after running SonarLint analysis. Actual result: No issues generated. No any log entries. Actual log looks like this: ```auto Clearing all issues because binding was updated Project 'com.[censored]-6.0' in server binding 'Internal SQ' updated Using configuration of 'com.[censored]-6.0' in server 'Internal SQ' Analysing '[censored]IntegrationTest.java'... Found 2 issues ``` Referenced issues are actual, but triggered by another rule. I expected to have 3 issues here. Server-side analysis works fine in this changed rule for both methods (with publishing results to SQ server and without it) - steps to reproduce - Actiavte the rule in profile. - Change setting for activated rule - Update binding in IDEA - Run SonarLint analysis - potential workaround: Another review/approval iteration after running server-side analysis. * * * 1. a-z 2. f ---
**Author:** ![petermbauer](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/sonarsource/user_avatar/community.sonarsource.com/petermbauer/32/1757_2.png) [@petermbauer](https://community.sonarsource.com/u/petermbauer)\ **Post date:** [February 5, 2019, 4:48pm UTC](https://community.sonarsource.com/t/sonarlint-and-sonarqube-lts-rules-arent-in-sync/4213/2 "2019-02-05T16:48:31Z")
Any news on that? No new version was released since Oct 2018 … ---
**Author:** ![Julien\_HENRY](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/sonarsource/user_avatar/community.sonarsource.com/julien_henry/32/61_2.png) [@Julien\_HENRY](https://community.sonarsource.com/u/Julien_HENRY)\ **Post date:** [July 1, 2019, 2:17pm UTC](https://community.sonarsource.com/t/sonarlint-and-sonarqube-lts-rules-arent-in-sync/4213/4 "2019-07-01T14:17:56Z")
Hi @svf, are you from the same company as @petermbauer? If yes, I think we can consider this is the same issue as [Rules deactivated in SonarQube EE but SonarLint applies them (Eclipse plugin)](https://community.sonarsource.com/t/rules-deactivated-in-sonarqube-ee-but-sonarlint-applies-them-eclipse-plugin/4337) (the quality profile is not correctly sync in SonarLint). ---
**Author:** ![petermbauer](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/sonarsource/user_avatar/community.sonarsource.com/petermbauer/32/1757_2.png) [@petermbauer](https://community.sonarsource.com/u/petermbauer)\ **Post date:** [July 1, 2019, 2:36pm UTC](https://community.sonarsource.com/t/sonarlint-and-sonarqube-lts-rules-arent-in-sync/4213/5 "2019-07-01T14:36:07Z")
Works now for me with latest SonarLint an SonarQube 7.6 after setting the include folders in the Eclipse project as in [SonarLint findings different from SonarQube server](https://community.sonarsource.com/t/sonarlint-findings-different-from-sonarqube-server/11252/2) thx, Peter ---
**Author:** ![svf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/bbce88/32.png) [@svf](https://community.sonarsource.com/u/svf)\ **Post date:** [July 1, 2019, 5:42pm UTC](https://community.sonarsource.com/t/sonarlint-and-sonarqube-lts-rules-arent-in-sync/4213/6 "2019-07-01T17:42:42Z")
No, it seems that these issues are different ---
**Author:** ![Julien\_HENRY](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/sonarsource/user_avatar/community.sonarsource.com/julien_henry/32/61_2.png) [@Julien\_HENRY](https://community.sonarsource.com/u/Julien_HENRY)\ **Post date:** [January 10, 2020, 3:22pm UTC](https://community.sonarsource.com/t/sonarlint-and-sonarqube-lts-rules-arent-in-sync/4213/7 "2020-01-10T15:22:20Z")
> [@svf](#): > > Analysing ‘[censored]IntegrationTest.java’… To me the issue was that the source file was considered as a test file, so no issues reported by SonarLint. ---
**Author:** ![Julien\_HENRY](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/sonarsource/user_avatar/community.sonarsource.com/julien_henry/32/61_2.png) [@Julien\_HENRY](https://community.sonarsource.com/u/Julien_HENRY)\ **Post date:** [January 10, 2020, 3:22pm UTC](https://community.sonarsource.com/t/sonarlint-and-sonarqube-lts-rules-arent-in-sync/4213/8 "2020-01-10T15:22:32Z")
Closing this thread due to lack of activity. Feel free to open a new thread if you still have an issue/question. ---
**Author:** ![Julien\_HENRY](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/sonarsource/user_avatar/community.sonarsource.com/julien_henry/32/61_2.png) [@Julien\_HENRY](https://community.sonarsource.com/u/Julien_HENRY)\ **Post date:** [January 10, 2020, 3:22pm UTC](https://community.sonarsource.com/t/sonarlint-and-sonarqube-lts-rules-arent-in-sync/4213/9 "2020-01-10T15:22:35Z")