# \[Java:S2390\] Accept inline child classes

**URL:** <https://community.sonarsource.com/t/java-s2390-accept-inline-child-classes/32297>\
**Category:** Report False-positive / False-negative...\
**Tags:** java\
**Created:** [October 2, 2020, 9:17am UTC](https://community.sonarsource.com/t/java-s2390-accept-inline-child-classes/32297 "2020-10-02T09:17:51Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Michael](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/sonarsource/user_avatar/community.sonarsource.com/michael/32/43_2.png) [@Michael](https://community.sonarsource.com/u/Michael)\
**Post date:** [October 2, 2020, 12:14pm UTC](https://community.sonarsource.com/t/java-s2390-accept-inline-child-classes/32297/2 "2020-10-02T12:14:17Z")

</div>

Hello,

Can you please split your message into several threads?  
It seems to me that the following is not at all related to your report about the FP on java:S2390.

> [@mfroehlich](#):
>
> [Lint] Specify default Qube binding in Workspace
> 
> There should be a way to specify a default/fallback rule set, that actually comes from SonarQube for projects without a specific SonarQube binding.
> 
> Currently all not bound projects produce A LOT of unwanted problems, because the Lint settings are at default (and they cannot be imported and hence set to something useful).
> 
> One time check with other quality profiles
> 
> Qube and Lint should provide an option to perform a one time check with different quality profiles (usually more strict ones) than bound and activated.
> 
> Many rules are not really relevant for the every day code work. But it’s interesting to know about some smells in your code from time to time.  
> r formatting

Thanks,  
Michael

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.sonarsource.com/t/java-s2390-accept-inline-child-classes/32297)._