# Analysis returns no issues when it should when building on remote linux machine

**URL:** <https://community.sonarsource.com/t/analysis-returns-no-issues-when-it-should-when-building-on-remote-linux-machine/128236>\
**Category:** Visual Studio\
**Created:** [October 16, 2024, 9:19pm UTC](https://community.sonarsource.com/t/analysis-returns-no-issues-when-it-should-when-building-on-remote-linux-machine/128236 "2024-10-16T21:19:59Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 12

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![michael.jabbour](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/sonarsource/user_avatar/community.sonarsource.com/michael.jabbour/32/38897_2.png) [@michael.jabbour](https://community.sonarsource.com/u/michael.jabbour)\
**Post date:** [November 28, 2024, 8:07am UTC](https://community.sonarsource.com/t/analysis-returns-no-issues-when-it-should-when-building-on-remote-linux-machine/128236/12 "2024-11-28T08:07:59Z")

</div>

Hi @camogamer, and thanks for sharing the issue with us.

I can confirm that we don’t support analyzing code built remotely on SonarLint for VS. This is currently supported [only for CLion](https://community.sonarsource.com/t/sonarlint-for-intellij-5-3-java-quick-fixes-cloud-secrets-detection/49669).

For the time being, I can only suggest analyzing using a native Windows compilation databse if the project supports that (as suggested previously by @vnaskos).

We have created [a card](https://portal.productboard.com/sonarsource/4-sonarqube-for-ide/c/699-on-visual-studio-analyze-your-c-and-c-code-built-using-a-remote-linux-machine-wsl) on our product board to add support for remote toolchain on VS, please feel free to vote or comment there to help our prioritization process.

Best regards,  
Michael

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.sonarsource.com/t/analysis-returns-no-issues-when-it-should-when-building-on-remote-linux-machine/128236)._
